top of page

California EPR – Responsible Textile Recovery Act (SB 707)

White Fabric Closeup

Key Highlights

Purpose & Scope

  • Establishes an Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) framework for textiles sold in California.

  • Shifts responsibility for textile waste management to producers/importers/brand owners.

  • Aims to increase reuse, recycling, circularity, and reduce landfill/incineration of textiles.

Who Is a “Producer”?

  • Brand owner or trademark holder selling textiles in California.

  • Importers or distributors if the brand owner is not based in the U.S.

  • Retailers selling private-label or exclusive brands.

  • E-commerce sellers included if they sell into California.

Covered Products

  • Apparel (all categories).

  • Home textiles: sheets, towels, bedding, curtains, rugs.

  • Accessories: bags, backpacks, soft luggage.

  • Footwear, uniforms, and textile-based gear.

  • Exceptions: carpets, mattresses, and certain industrial textiles already covered by other EPR laws.

Producer Requirements

  • Join or create a Producer Responsibility Organization (PRO).

  • Pay annual EPR fees based on volume and type of textiles sold.

  • Develop and implement a statewide textile recovery plan including:

    • Textile collection and drop-off network.

    • Sorting and reuse systems.

    • Recycling infrastructure (mechanical, chemical, T2T).

    • Reporting, auditing, and performance metrics.

Mandatory Goals & Performance Metrics

  • Increase textile reuse, repair, and recycling rates.

  • Reduce disposal to landfill or incineration.

  • Establish equitable access to collection points.

  • Support domestic recycling market development.

  • Annual reporting to CalRecycle on progress, tonnage, recovery outcomes.

Implementation Timeline

  • 2025–2026: PRO formation, program design, registration.

  • 2027: Program launch; collection network operational.

  • 2027–2030: Increasing recovery, recycling, market-development requirements.

  • Full implementation by 2030, including annual audits and compliance reviews.

Compliance Obligations for Brands

  • Submit SKU-level product data to PRO.

  • Pay EPR fees tied to product type, material content, and volume.

  • Labeling or consumer education as defined by PRO.

  • Maintain full documentation for audits.

  • Prohibited from selling textiles in CA if not in compliance.

Penalties

  • Fines for non-compliance, inaccurate reporting, or failing to join a PRO.

  • Potential restrictions on product sales in California for repeat violations.

Impact for Retailers, Manufacturers & Supply Chains

  • Increased demand for recycled inputs, especially T2T rPET, MMCF, and mechanically recycled cotton.

  • Need for SKU-level traceability and material transparency.

  • Strong push toward design for recyclability and mono-material constructs.

  • Supplier capability audits and alignment for EPR readiness.

  • Opportunity for long-term offtake agreements, circular design partnerships, and local recycling investment.

Strategic Opportunities

  • Early movers gain advantage in:

    • Material certification and recycled content strategy.

    • Closed-loop partnerships (collect–sort–recycle).

    • Data/PLM integration for EPR reporting.

    • Consumer-facing circular programs (repair, resale, recommerce).

  • Potential for reduced fees through eco-modulated fee structures (design choices that improve recyclability).

 

LoopLab Support Capabilities

Circular products and material design enablement.

• Recyclability engineering and mono‑material optimization.

• ESPR, DPP, and California EPR compliance readiness frameworks.

• Supplier capability assessments and governance systems.

• Data model alignment for PLM, EPR reporting, and DPP integration.

• EPR fee modeling, eco‑modulation optimization, and risk mitigation.

• Roadmap creation, cross-functional training, and implementation support.

bottom of page